Repository | Series | Book | Chapter
Politics and patterns of developing indigenous knowledge under Western disciplinary compartmentalization
the case of philosophical schools in modern China and Japan
pp. 125-153
Abstract
Since the nineteenth century, knowledge has gradually been categorized as falling within distinct academic disciplines. Key elements in this process have been various forms of compartmentalization: some of these forms are cognitive (e.g. bibliographical classification), and others organizational (e.g. departments in universities). This compartmentalization of knowledge has become a major site of intellectual contestation, legitimizing or marginalizing bodies of knowledge (Collins and Ben-David 1966, Gieryn 1983). This compartmentalization has helped to displace pre-modern Western knowledge and marginalize contemporary cross-disciplinary knowledge (Foucault 1970, Messer-Davidow, Shumway, and Sylvan 1993). However, the ways in which disciplinary compartmentalization has affected indigenous knowledge in non-Western cultures remain largely unexplored.
Publication details
Published in:
Kusch Martin (2000) The sociology of philosophical knowledge. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 125-153
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9399-1_6
Full citation:
Chew Matthew (2000) „Politics and patterns of developing indigenous knowledge under Western disciplinary compartmentalization: the case of philosophical schools in modern China and Japan“, In: M. Kusch (ed.), The sociology of philosophical knowledge, Dordrecht, Springer, 125–153.