Repository | Book | Chapter
Daniel Ouezzin Coulibaly
Descartes wasn't always right, Diderot maybe
pp. 195-235
Abstract
Rumor has it that Henry Morton Stanley perplexed over a quandary facing colonialists: "we cannot justify our presence among "natives' if we do not educate them; but I suspect that we are not prepared for what they will say about us when and if we do teach them to write."1 Stanley correctly predicted that "natives' would have different understandings of the colonial act and that what appeared to the colonizers as virtues and necessities may well appear to the former as weaknesses and acts of barbarism. Stanley's ruminations also show that the colonial act was accompanied by anxieties over the eventual prise de parole by natives, that is their self-conscious expressions of thought on colonialism. The core of these anxieties has been whether postcolonial discourses can be aligned on the rationalizations of the colonial act by its agents.
Publication details
Published in:
Grovogui Siba N (2006) Beyond eurocentrism and anarchy: memories of international order and institutions. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 195-235
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-08396-8_6
Full citation:
(2006) Daniel Ouezzin Coulibaly: Descartes wasn't always right, Diderot maybe, In: Beyond eurocentrism and anarchy, Dordrecht, Springer, 195–235.