Repository | Book | Chapter
Ineffability
a response to William Rowe and Christopher Insole
pp. 76-89
Abstract
The term "ineffable", meaning inexpressible, transcending description, beyond the scope of our human concepts, is good semantic currency with a respectable Latin lineage. But today, because of such similar-sounding but very different-meaning words and phrases as "effing" and "the eff word", we may well be slightly uncomfortable with "ineffable" and ready for an alternative. I suggest "transcategorial", that is, outside or beyond the range of our categories of thought, and I shall use both terms in what follows.
Publication details
Published in:
Hick John (2010) Dialogues in the philosophy of religion. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Pages: 76-89
Full citation:
Hick John (2010) Ineffability: a response to William Rowe and Christopher Insole, In: Dialogues in the philosophy of religion, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 76–89.