Repository | Book | Chapter

209288

Ineffability

a response to William Rowe and Christopher Insole

John Hick

pp. 76-89

Abstract

The term "ineffable", meaning inexpressible, transcending description, beyond the scope of our human concepts, is good semantic currency with a respectable Latin lineage. But today, because of such similar-sounding but very different-meaning words and phrases as "effing" and "the eff word", we may well be slightly uncomfortable with "ineffable" and ready for an alternative. I suggest "transcategorial", that is, outside or beyond the range of our categories of thought, and I shall use both terms in what follows.

Publication details

Published in:

Hick John (2010) Dialogues in the philosophy of religion. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Pages: 76-89

DOI: 10.1057/9780230283978_4

Full citation:

Hick John (2010) Ineffability: a response to William Rowe and Christopher Insole, In: Dialogues in the philosophy of religion, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 76–89.