Repository | Series | Book | Chapter
The duhemian argument
pp. 116-131
Abstract
No general features of the logic of falsifiability can assure, for every isolated empirical hypotheses H and independently of the domain to which it pertains, that H can always be preserved as an explanans of any emprical findings O whatever by some modification of the auxiliary assumptions A in conjunction with which H functions as an explanans. For Duhem cannot guarantee on any general logical grounds the deducibility of O from an explanans constituted by the conjunction of H and some revised non-trivial version R of A: the existence of the required set R of collateral assumptions must be demonstrated for each particular case.
Publication details
Published in:
Harding Sandra (1976) Can theories be refuted?: essays on the Duhem-Quine thesis. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 116-131
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_7
Full citation:
Grünbaum Adolf (1976) „The duhemian argument“, In: S. Harding (ed.), Can theories be refuted?, Dordrecht, Springer, 116–131.