Repository | Journal | Volume | Article
Ramsification and inductive inference
pp. 569-577
Abstract
An argument, different from the Newman objection, against the view that the cognitive content of a theory is exhausted by its Ramsey sentence is reviewed. The crux of the argument is that Ramsification may ruin inductive systematization between theory and observation. The argument also has some implications concerning the issue of underdetermination.
Publication details
Published in:
(2012) Synthese 187 (2).
Pages: 569-577
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-010-9861-9
Full citation:
Raatikainen Panu (2012) „Ramsification and inductive inference“. Synthese 187 (2), 569–577.