Repository | Series | Book | Chapter

210508

The end of the debate over extended cognition

Jeffrey B. WagmanAnthony Chemero

pp. 105-124

Abstract

One of the more lively current debates in philosophy of cognitive science and philosophy of mind is over the possibility of extended cognition. Recently, though, this debate has hit a dead end, with proponents and opponents agreeing that whether cognition is sometimes extended is an empirical matter, but not knowing what an empirical demonstration of extended cognition would look like.

Publication details

Published in:

Solymosi Tibor, Shook John (2014) Neuroscience, neurophilosophy and pragmatism: brains at work with the world. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Pages: 105-124

DOI: 10.1057/9781137376077_5

Full citation:

Wagman Jeffrey B., Chemero Anthony (2014) „The end of the debate over extended cognition“, In: T. Solymosi & J. Shook (eds.), Neuroscience, neurophilosophy and pragmatism, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 105–124.