Repository | Series | Book | Chapter
Validation and vindication
pp. 378-392
Abstract
The following schematic dialogue was constructed with the intention of illustrating some of the typical turns and twists which occur almost invariably when argument in moral issues is pursued through successive levels of critical reflection. A more systematic formulation of the philosophical conclusions that may be derived from a study of such justificatory arguments will be presented in the second part of this essay.
Publication details
Published in:
Feigl Herbert (1981) Inquiries and provocations: selected writings 1929–1974. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 378-392
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-9426-9_21
Full citation:
Feigl Herbert (1981) Validation and vindication, In: Inquiries and provocations, Dordrecht, Springer, 378–392.