Repository | Series | Book | Chapter

211437

The interregnum

Stephen P. Turner

pp. 92-104

Abstract

was the first person to bring the Enlightenment conception of the social sciences to a point sufficient for us fully to understand and appraise it. Subsequent elaboration has added nothing essential to his argument and removed nothing that makes a substantial difference. No one who either favours or opposes the basic claim — the claim that there are social laws just as there are physical laws, and that therefore the structure, procedure, and aims of the social sciences must resemble that of the physical sciences — is likely to have his opinion altered by considering conceptual developments after Mill. All the conceptual information necessary for concluding for, or against, the view which he advocates can be found in his writings (Brown, 1984, p. 5).

Publication details

Published in:

Turner Stephen P. (1986) The search for a methodology of social science: Durkheim, Weber, and the nineteenth-century problem of cause, probability, and action. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 92-104

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-3461-5_5

Full citation:

Turner Stephen P. (1986) The interregnum, In: The search for a methodology of social science, Dordrecht, Springer, 92–104.